One Ui 7 rollout regionally.🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[Toon3535]

Why still want to rollout regionally? One shot rollout globally will see all the problems immediately, by region this month Korea ok, next month india not ok then back to delay， delay and forever delay again. Other countries not even have the chance to update. Which id_io_t give this regionally idea to Samsung? 

Da_m_n stupid~

[oNeuNo]

I understand your frustration regarding Samsung's regional rollout strategy for software updates. While it might seem inefficient, there are several reasons behind this approach:

*1. Risk Mitigation:*
Releasing updates regionally allows Samsung to monitor for any unforeseen issues in a controlled environment. For instance, the recent One UI 7 update was paused globally after a significant bug was discovered that prevented some Galaxy S24 users from unlocking their devices. This issue was first reported by South Korean users, and the regional rollout helped contain the problem before it affected a broader user base.

*2. Regional Customizations:*
Samsung devices often have region-specific customizations, including carrier-specific features and applications. Rolling out updates regionally ensures that these customizations are properly integrated and tested, providing a seamless experience for users in each region.

*3. Infrastructure and Compliance:*
Different regions have varying network infrastructures and regulatory requirements. A staggered rollout allows Samsung to ensure compliance with local regulations and compatibility with regional network standards.

*4. Resource Management:*
Managing a global rollout requires significant resources. By releasing updates in phases, Samsung can allocate resources more effectively, addressing issues as they arise without overwhelming their support and development teams.

While the regional rollout strategy has its drawbacks, such as delays in certain areas, it's designed to ensure a stable and compliant user experience worldwide. Samsung is continually working to improve its update processes, and feedback from users like you is invaluable in driving these improvements.

[Toon3535]

Regionally create more havoc because those countries which is not update is a risk to face bug later, then those countries at the back need to wait how many countries bug delay??
Rollout 1 shot globally, at the same time know all the issues and solve it 1 shot. 🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️

[oNeuNo]

I understand your frustration regarding Samsung's regional rollout strategy for software updates. While a simultaneous global release might seem more efficient, Samsung employs a phased approach to ensure a stable and reliable user experience. This method allows them to identify and address potential issues in specific regions before a wider release. For instance, the recent One UI 7 update was paused globally after a significant bug was discovered that prevented some Galaxy S24 users from unlocking their devices. This issue was first reported by South Korean users, and the regional rollout helped contain the problem before it affected a broader user base.

While this approach can lead to delays in certain regions, it ultimately aims to provide a more stable and secure update for all users. Samsung is continually working to improve its update processes, and feedback from users like you is invaluable in driving these improvements.

[Toon3535]

Look at Samsung so call Pro Team able to provide stable and secure update?

If from the beginning rollout globally already can avoid so many delays.

Let say tomorrow U.S update, Samsung dare to give 100% no issue anymore? Since already not able to guarantee just rollout globally, i believe users willing to face it together rather than wait and wait and wait and fake hope from Samsung. That is why all disappointed with Samsung.

[oNeuNo]

The phased rollout strategy, despite delays, allows Samsung to ensure that updates are tested and optimized for various regions and hardware configurations. This strategy minimizes risks associated with global rollouts, where any major issue could affect a much larger user base. Samsung is continuously working to improve its update processes and to address user concerns in a timely manner. However, the goal is always to deliver a stable, secure, and well-optimized update for all users-something that a global rollout would jeopardize.

[Toon3535]

When come to hardware also make users angry, just use snapdragon processors will do, Exynos is just an expeiment processor not stable at all, why sell unstable processor to end users? Thats why create so many havoc, update can use in snapdragon and not stable for exynos, Super Duper stup_id.🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️🤦 ♂️

[oNeuNo]

It's understandable why users feel frustrated with the Exynos processors, especially when Snapdragon-powered devices seem to outperform them in terms of stability, performance, and efficiency. The mismatch between software updates and hardware performance can certainly cause a lot of issues.

While Exynos still has some way to go, Samsung continues to work on improving its processors. In the meantime, it's a challenge for Samsung to balance cost, performance, and market strategy, and this sometimes leaves users in regions with Exynos-powered devices feeling less prioritized.

It's always a valid concern to want the best possible hardware in your phone, and your feedback about Exynos is an important part of the conversation. Hopefully, future improvements will make these issues a thing of the past.

[Toon3535]

Human being can accept a company not smart than a LIAR. Agreee?

[Toon3535]

The Exynos is not a stable processor meaning not success invent yet already sell to end users. Want to save cost must success invented only sell, dont make end user be white mouse to test your unsuccess item. Is that ethical to do so?