I might be considered by many of the readers in this community to be a Samsung brand advocate. Thanks for such an honor but I prefer to remain impartial; though, I am inclined to often include Samsung as one of the options that I'll consider.
Having said this, let me share with you something that might be misconstrued as an inconsistent stand. Here it goes : "Do not be deceived by how the marketing of a gadget from any brand promotes a device." This statement is a general one and this does not exclude Samsung.
It's quite common to (always) ask : "How do you decide which gadget to buy?" Normally, most people will respond with the safest (yet, likely, sincere) statement : "It depends on the functionalities that I wanted to use."
A few people (including me) consider another aspect before buying a new gadget. Before proceeding, let's qualify the scenario : let it be established that the scenario is that the person is already planning to buy a gadget whether or not because of the need to have a new one.
To me, it's very important to also ask "how frequent will I use this gadget?" I am firm that this will make sense provided that, in the recent years, new models arise almost every half-a-year. The question "how frequent will I use this gadget?" complements the implied question "what's the purpose why I need or want this gadget?"
I will share with you, dear reader, an unsolicited advice : "Do not buy expensive gadgets if you intend to use it almost every hour." Again, this is an advice. From where is this advice coming? To me, buying a gadget is investing in an asset that will depreciate. It's, essentially, like a gamble. The return on investment is likely less of (and, even, not about) a financial profit. Definitely, as a personally-used device, the return on investment is more on (and, likely, entirely about) emotional satisfaction.
I take care of my devices just as, I believe, you do, dear readers. (Come on; who else keep[s] on checking if the physical appearance of his or her gadget is still okay if the said device accidentally fell from a very low height? 😄 Come on, raise your hand; reply with an emoticon; reply with something like "Guilty! I check!")
There is nothing wrong with rewarding one's self with expensive gadgets; of course, that which are legally and fairly acquired. The main point of this blog is that, as much as possible, do not use expensive gadgets almost every hour. If the main purpose is for work or for intensive or, likely, more-frequent-than-usual communication activities, do not use the expensive gadget. Use a "basic" one; something that won't cost you so much if it deteriorates faster than expected.
To me, I always strike a balance. More often than not, I turn off my expensive device for a couple of hours. It's like giving it a rest. It will also help make the battery have a longer life.
Nonetheless, I'm not, in anyway, trying to persuade you to change your view on the matter or style of usage. I'm just sharing a thought which you might want to consider if you feel like it. After all, the investment on the expensive gadget that you have is likely from your hard-earned income, right?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts though I disagree on using expensive gadgets every hour. Flagship devices are made to be workhorse gadgets. And based from experience, they are built for productivity and multitasking. I buy expensive gadgets and use it to it's full extent but never had a problem, compared to midrange units which often fails after continued heavy usage. Gadget care is something I've always paid attention to, I'd rather maximize the money I paid for whatever device I'm using.
